For more than two decades, Emil Michael has operated at the fault line between Silicon Valley ambition and American geopolitical power, helping scale one of techâs most disruptive companies before returning to government to shape how artificial intelligence will be used in war. Self-proclaimed âone of the best deal guysâ Michael has now become the Pentagonâs most aggressive public combatant in its escalating standoff with Anthropic.Â
On Friday, the conflict seemed to escalate to a boiling point with Trump posting to Truth Social: âI am directing EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use of Anthropicâs technology. We donât need it, we donât want it, and will not do business with them again!â The post went on to describe a six-month phaseout period and unspecified threats to Anthropic should it not cooperate.
Thus far, Michael has embraced President Donald Trumpâs edicts, including the demand that the Department of Defense (renamed the Department of War) become an âAIâfirstâ organization, publicly arguing that whoever moves fastest on AI will dominate future conflicts. âSpeed defines victory in the AI era, and the War Department will match the velocity of Americaâs AI industry,â he said in remarks outlining a new tech strategy that centers AI alongside hypersonic and directedâenergy weapons. âWeâre pulling in the best talent, the most cuttingâedge technology, and embedding the top frontier AI models into the workforceâall at a rapid wartime pace.â A Department of War spokesperson underscored to Fortune that Michael is âleading the mandate to secure U.S. military technological dominance. Emilâs team is moving at unprecedented speed to deliver new advanced capabilities to the war fighter, as reflected in his engagement with hundreds of industry partners during his first nine months as undersecretary.âÂ
Anthropic was supposed to be the crown jewel of the Pentagonâs AI push. Its Claude model is one of the few large language systems cleared for certain classified environments and is already deeply embedded in defense workflows through contractors like Palantir. Pulling it out could take months, according to a report by Defense One, making the startup not just a vendor but a critical node in the militaryâs emerging AI infrastructure.
But Anthropic also imposed limits that Michael views as fundamentally incompatible with war-fighting. The companyâs internal âClaude Constitutionâ and contract terms prohibit the modelâs use in, for instance, mass surveillance of Americans or fully autonomous lethal systemsâeven for government customers. When Michael and other officials sought to renegotiate those terms as part of a roughly $200 million defense deal, they insisted Claude be available for âall lawful purposes.â Michael framed the demand bluntly: âYou canât have an AI company sell AI to the Department of War and [not] let it do Department of War things.â
The battle between the DOW and Anthropic raises two important questions: How will the Trump administration and AI giants work together going forward? And who is Michael, the man who is making decisions on behalf of the biggest AI customer on the planet?

Who is Emil Michael?
Born in Egypt but raised in the United States, Michael attended Harvard University as an undergraduate and earned a law degree from Stanford. He began his career with a quick stint at Goldman Sachs as an associate in the communications, media, and entertainment investment banking group, before jumping into tech at Tellme Networks in 1999, a voice-recognition company that he helped run before it was acquired by Microsoft in 2007 for roughly $800 million.
His move to the startup world was inspired by Clayton Christensenâs The Innovatorâs Dilemma, which argues that market leaders, by nature, are often set up to fail. âThis thesis made me really understand how the technology industry was going to be much bigger, much faster than most thought in the late â90s,â he told Authority Magazine in 2021. âThis made me take the risk of working at my first startup because I believed that big companies were at risk of being disrupted due to the advent of the internet and mobile phones.â
From there, Michael took a less conventional path than many Silicon Valley executives by moving into government, serving from 2009 to 2011 as a White House fellow under President Barack Obama, serving as special assistant to thenâDefense Secretary Robert Gates at the DOD where he managed projects in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan and oversaw efforts aimed at reducing bureaucracy to provide resources to soldiers.
Michael returned to Silicon Valley where, following a brief run at social media analytics company Klout, he joined Uber in 2013 as chief business officer and a close lieutenant to CEO Travis Kalanick. Over the next four years, he helped orchestrate one of the most aggressive expansions in corporate history, in which Uber raised nearly $15 billion and saw its valuation soar to roughly $70 billion.Â
During his time at Uber, Michael became a member of Pentagonâs Defense Business Board, an advisory group that shares best practices from the private sector with government agencies. At the time of his appointment, he was the only board member with tech startup experience.
Michael left Uber in 2017, but made some news of his own along the way. Three years before his departure, BuzzFeed reported that he had âoutlined the notion of spending âa million dollarsââ to hire four top opposition researchers and four journalists to look into the personal lives of journalists who covered Uber and its executives. That same year, while in Seoul, Michael and several Uber executives (including Kalanick) visited a âhostess-escort karaoke barâ where female hostesses were presented to the group, according to accounts later reported to Uberâs human resources department. Four men selected hostesses and remained at the venue to sing karaoke. At least one female Uber manager in the group said the situation made her uncomfortable and filed a complaint with HR roughly a year later. The story of the HR complaint surfaced three months before Michael left Uber. An investigation by Business Insider reported that Michael resigned in the wake of U.S. Attorney General Eric Holderâs investigation into Uberâs workplaceâwhich prompted the company to implement dozens of policy and leadership changes. (A spokesperson for the Department of War declined to comment on Michaelâs conduct.)
Michael returns to Washington, with a mission at the Department of War
Michael has since apologized for both incidents, took a brief detour as a SPAC CEO, yet found himself back in Washington when Donald Trump tapped him in December 2024 to become undersecretary of defense for research and engineeringâeffectively the Pentagonâs chief technology officer. The Senate confirmed him in 2025, installing a Silicon Valleyâtrained business executive at the center of how the War Department thinks about AI, autonomy, and advanced weapons systems.Â
His portfolio dovetails with Trumpâera efforts to centralize AI governance at the federal level and prioritize American AI, including an executive order aimed at overriding stricter state rules and pushing agencies to classify and tightly manage âhigh impactâ AI systems in 2026. Public biographies from the Department of War emphasize his record raising tens of billions in private capital and forging global partnerships as proof he can corral the private sector into serving U.S. strategic aims.
In an internal memo cutting the Pentagonâs long list of priority technologies down to six, he wrote that the previous list âdid not provide the focus that the threat environment of today requires,â and declared that âin alignment with President Trumpâs Artificial Intelligence (AI) Action Plan, the Department of War must become an âAIâFirstâ organization.â
When Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei balked at the Pentagonâs demands, warning the proposed language the DOW wanted could allow safeguards to be bypassed, Michael responded by taking the fight public. He accused Amodei of having a âGod complex,â called him âa liar,â and warned that no private company should be able to dictate the militaryâs options. The Pentagon, he insisted, âwill ALWAYS follow the law but will not yield to the desires of any profit-driven tech firm.â
Now the standoff has reached a breaking point. Anthropic faces both Trumpâs social media directive to scrub Anthropic from federal agencies (a demand it is unclear if he can enforce) and a Friday 5 p.m. Eastern deadline to accept the Pentagonâs terms or risk losing its contract entirelyâa move that could force the military to rip out one of its most advanced AI systems and send a chilling message across Silicon Valley. The Friday deadline when Congress is not in session prevents that arm of the government intervening in a showdown that, as AI scholar Gary Marcus wrote, âmay literally be life or death for all of us.â
For Michael, the battle appears to reflect a belief forged across his careerâfrom Uberâs global expansion battles to the Pentagonâs AI buildupâthat control over transformative technology cannot remain in private hands when national security is at stake. The question now is how far heâs willing to go to achieve that end.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
